Gordon Smith is a Fristian after all. OPB News has reported that Smith will be supporting Bill Frist's Nuclear Option to end the ability for Democrats to filibuster Bush's right wing conservative judicial nominees. Currently there are only seven nominees the Dems are planning to block through the filibuster. They've already approved just over 200 of Bush's conservative nominees, giving Bush a 95% success rate, something Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr., and Bill Clinton could have only dreamed of during their first terms in office.
It was pretty clear to me, despite the spin, when I called Smith's office a few weeks ago what his position on the matter would be. I called his office today to confirm the news and this time there was no spin. I asked if it was true Smith had chosen to support the nuclear option (I used the term nuclear option) and the office assistant said "yes" he does support it.
It's beyond me how on earth Smith has gotten labled as a moderate. Ending the right for the minority party to block the most extreme nominees through a filibuster is radical. There is nothing moderate about it. Come on you guys, get rid of your soft spots for Smith. For cryin' out loud!
Today it's about ending the right to filibuster judicial nominees. Tomorrow it will be about ending the right to filibuster Social Security legislation or whatever else these radicals want to do with their slim majority.
Is anyone gathering all this information on Smith so that it can hang like an albatross around his neck in '08?
Sid: I've eaten crow on my own blog on this, but I will certainly own up to giving Sen. Smith TOO much credit for his inconsequential positions on ANWR and Medicaid last month. If he really meant it on either or both, he would have voted against the Rs' most outrageous budget last week (as they had 52 votes, he still could have done so on principle and not be hung out to dry by his party). Smith's "conversion" to moderation appears both short-lived and insincere, and your confirmation of his vote on the nuclear option only underscores this. Let's continue to expose the truth - then the evidence will be in hand for '08 in any case...
Posted by: andrew | May 01, 2005 at 04:46 PM
We have no choice but to expose the truth and to keep holding it out there. Smith will go faux-moderate again in about Nov. '07.
Oh, and we all have to eat crow every once in a while ;-)
Posted by: Sid | May 01, 2005 at 05:17 PM
Hi Sid,
Word has it that Smith might not run for re-election. Have you heard any of this? It is just a rumor of course, but many close to him are saying that he has had enough. In all honesty, he doesn't really need the money or whatever as he has the business in Eastern Oregon that makes him a tiddy sum.
What is disturbing about this is that we may see him align more and more with the religious conservatives as he may have nothing to loose from betraying Oregonians. This little horse trading tidbit may be just one example of what is to come. I haven't a crystal ball, so I guess we will see. :)
Great blog, BTW!
~Amadeus
Posted by: Amadeus | May 02, 2005 at 12:09 AM
Amadeus-
Interesting. No, I haven't heard that at all. If it's true and he does align himself more with the religious conservatives it will leave a bad taste in the mouths of many Oregonians, leaving the next GOP candidate with a broken tool-box.
Also, if Smith is leaving, perhaps it's part of the revolving door snydrome that has hit so many DC politicians.
Posted by: Sid | May 02, 2005 at 11:01 AM
I had the chance to talk personally with our dear old Kitzhaber a couple of months back, and when I brought it up, he expressed interest in the Senate seat for '08. By then, it may be too late, as our democracy may already be lost, but that's one sure seat we'd win back!
Posted by: Doran | May 18, 2005 at 11:06 PM
I would love it if Kitzhaber ran. He knows what's goin' on.
Posted by: Sid | May 19, 2005 at 08:51 PM
affected beginning ozone cupcake past tropical atmosphere shop
Posted by: chadburnfu | July 15, 2009 at 08:20 PM